you may know the maximum age for women to donate eggs is 34
but you probably didn’t know the maximum age for men to donate sperm is 39
so “until death a man is in his prime” is COPE
a “wallet” may be in his prime until death but a “breeding bull” is only in his prime until 39. you can do Testosterone Replacement Therapy ( TRT ) and take Viagra and FEEL younger but your sperm is still garbage. doesn’t mean you can’t have kids - but your kids will probably be retarded like Barron Trump.
How retarded is Barron ? Trump couldn’t even get Barron into Columbia which is right next to Trump Tower in NYC. Instead Barron had to go to NYU which is NOT an Ivy League school and in a different part of Manhattan. Barron is a MORON which may be due to his mother being a hooker but most likely due to Trump being too old when Barron was conceived and the sperm used to conceive Barron being faulty.
whereas women run out of eggs as they age men always produce sperm but the quality of sperm is only deemed acceptable until 39.
we laugh at women for not knowing their expiration date but we don’t know ours, because denial and lack of self awareness is universal. it is the same for Jews and Christians, Men and Women.
so if ( in Jewish religion, which is pretty legit on this matter ) boys become men at 13 and girls become women at 12 then:
woman’s life : 12-34
man’s life : 13-39
you can always count on me to bring the bad news frens LOL
you think i wanted to hear this ? i am in mid 40s
1 Like
what happened was i was trolling women on X telling them how they’re expired hoes and that women can’t donate eggs after 34 because they run out of eggs and a woman called “Man Hating Bitch” replied that there is a cutoff for men as well.
so i asked Google AI and this was the response:
My advice to all my Frens over 35 is to get a prenup, marry a 29 year old woman and have two kids.
yes your marriage will probably fail. do it anyway.
There will probably be some variance with regard to sperm quality from man to man; for instance, I am visibly less aged than most men my same age, however I am still starting to see some silver and notice some changes in energy level and so on.
At this point if we want children we have to accept compromises since we did not succeed at our peak. To be fair, this was very common for our generation, and for women also. Birth rates are in the toilet in general.
And yes - unfortunately - the statistics say that while 20-something women are the most fertile, they are also not having children, especially not the more intelligent / less dysgenic ones. The statistics say this latter group only has children around 30+. So yes, 29 is probably more realistic. The ones that would possibly do that for me are currently 23-24… I did have a brief thing last summer with a girl who was about 30 and still looked good but she was also a drug addict / Burning Man type of chick like some of the girls I dated back in the day. That’s a bit of an unstable type to be a mother.
I suppose the black pill is that we can not at this point really “have nice things” at our age but only a chance at something OK-ish. However, I agree that it’s better than nothing. The point being that everything for us would be a compromise from here on out and we have to be OK with that.
Note - all the old days friends I still keep in touch with are basically in the same situation, just having children at the onset of middle age[1]. It sucks but it’s not uncommon now.
[1] - a few started earlier (including one half-Jewish guy who briefly lived in Israel and met his wife there LOL) but I mostly didn’t keep in touch with them.
1 Like
My personality is to assume the worst. So i would assume the sperm is as bad as the chronological age suggests regardless of what you look like.
But if your personality is to hope for the best nothing i can do to change that. If somebody believes they are going to heaven after they die there is nothing i can do to change that either.
And to be clear i don’t actually know one way or the other either with respect to sperm or heaven, but i always assume the worst.
There is probably a way to test sperm quality but it doesn’t fundamentally change the situation. The sooner you have kids the better the odds are of it working out on a biological level.
Again this comes down to personality. Some people think too far ahead so they’re always depressed. Others believe they can always fix things later no matter how far gone they already are. This is not really a function of intelligence - but more a question of neurotransmitter balance, or maybe ideology.
Democrats think we shouldn’t worry about the great replacement until whites are literally being slaughtered in the streets like in Haiti. Republicans think we shouldn’t worry about damage to environment until the whole planet looks like India. Personally i think it is never too early to start worrying but that’s also why i am always depressed.
1 Like
As estimates go that is pretty spot on. On the other hand since your life changes at 40+ it’s actually not a bad time to marry and have children because you’re only sacrificing your later years which won’t be as good anyway. The only problem is you don’t want to end up with like defective children or whatnot. I’m guessing some of the overall problems with the white race in our times are because of long term and consistent high parental age, but to mitigate this you must at least choose a somewhat younger woman. Worthy of more thought at least.
in the long run ( like 10 generations down the line ) defective genes will shake out …
just keep making mutants …
1 Like
I think 40-55 range is probably the better years, you still functioning ok but now you have resources. 25 is great but without money you are a pissant and no man.
1 Like
I just had to share the information with you
what you do with it is up to you
