Music as example of why Age of Consent is a Crime Against Humanity

Sex As Human Right
1

look at this chart

image
image1186×988 85.8 KB

the chart shows our tendency to “fall in love” with a song depending on how old you were when the song came out …

it peaks at age 15, which is also the age at which female sexual attractiveness peaks

we’re not allowed to say that of course, we are forced to pretend women peak in their “early 20s” to avoid being labeled pedophiles, but all men know that 13-17 year old girls are the sweetest. this is similar to how we are all forced to say that women are as strong as men and blacks are as smart as whites but nobody asks women for help moving furniture and nobody copies answers on a math test from a black guy.

we all know the truth - we just can’t say it. and the truth is girls are already past their peak at 18. this is why there is more porn with girls pretending to be 18 than of girls of all other ages combined. and if “child” porn was legal most would watch porn with girls aged 13 - 17. but i digress.

the overall shape of the peak is also similar to the shape of the peak of the curve for female attractiveness though obviously girls cannot be of negative age while songs can be ( of negative age relative to when you were born ) so it’s obviously not an exact match …

regardless of which curve you look at the take home point is that we are most alive at age 15 because that is when our life is supposed to happen …

this is, coincidentally, the age of most video game and anime characters as well all for the same reasons …

if you read any books before modern age it was understood that a girl should marry around the age of 15, and this was at a time when girls used to hit puberty at age 13 …

today girls hit puberty between ages 9 and 11 due in part to high calorie diets and in part to estrogen in everything ( pesticides, cosmetics, plastic bottles etc. ) the elites engineer all the chemicals in our environment for estrogenic activity in order to turn boys trans, but it seems there may be a side effect of girls reaching puberty sooner …

still, we are talking about the mind here, and not the uterus, so let’s keep the figure 15 as the peak of emotional capacity so to speak …

if a girl is to be happy in a life long relationship with her husband they MUST be together when she is 15 or her husband will be as irrelevant to her as modern music is to boomers …

a man will simply not register with a woman’s mind unless he was both one of her first ones AND they had a relationship when she was 13 - 17 or so …

referencing the curve at 18 the window is already closing and by the time the girl is out of college it is pretty much closed - any man who meets a woman after she graduated from college will never be more than a wallet - somebody who pays the bills while she fucks niggers on the side …

some like @kanyewest make foolish arguments such as " but when a girl is 15 she can legally date boys that are 15 " … yes that is true … but are any 15 year old boys marriage material ? NO.

a typical man becomes marriageable after about 5 years of work after college, so at about age 27 or so … whereas a typical girl is marriageable at age 13 ( which is the age at which a girl wants to have sex with men ) …

if we do not legally allow for a 25 year old man to marry a 15 year old girl the odds of the marriage lasting a lifetime are significantly reduced …

and of course MOST marriages now end in divorce … this is 100% predictable … you can’t marry a 30 year old woman who has been with 20 other men and expect the marriage to last … just like you can’t hear the latest style of music for the first time when you’re 50 and be like " this is fire ! " no you will be " kids these days call this garbage music ??? "

you can’t teach an old dog new tricks. our development follows a very specific pre-defined curve and there is a very specific time ( about age 13 - 17 ) to form life-long relationships. take any story like Romeo and Juliet - it is always this age range.

anybody in favor of an age of consent at 18 ( or anything over 13 or so ) is either extremely foolish or preaching to the choir or both.

2

I understand that women peak in sexual attractiveness as teenagers. What I am saying is that just because you find a 16 year old sexually attractive does not mean that it is a good idea to normalize sexual relations between teenage girls and old men. This is about what’s best for society and promoting healthy families with well-adjusted mothers and fathers raising well-adjusted children.

3

The most successful marriages are between couples who met early in life like high school and have only had one partner. They date when they are teenagers and marry when they are adults. Marriages between older men and younger women aren’t nearly as successful.

4

i have no doubt that is true, but what percentage of overall marriages is this ? what does it matter if 5% of marriages are 100% successful ?

reality is it is basically impossible for two teens who started dating in high school to marry each other unless neither of them go to college. in today’s world most jobs require a college degree and the odds of them going to same college is small since boys and girls pursue different majors. the odds that they are still together after college are vanishingly small. yes it happens, but you can’t use this edge case to justify a system that has CLEARLY FAILED overall.

not in US, but in places like Saudi Arabia they are plenty successful.

you can’t deny the Muzzies are out-breeding us.

divorce is unheard of in countries where it is the norm for 30 year old men to marry 15 year old girls, whereas in America most marriages end in divorce and our “conservative” president ( Trump ) has been married like 5 times …

you are defending a failed system imposed on you by the enemy because you are physically incapable of questioning the status quo …

5

Saudi Arabia is a country that if it weren’t for the oil that happens to be underground would be nothing more than camel herders living like it was medieval times. I don’t look at cultures like these as examples to follow. They never contributed anything to the world.

6

well if you recall we are using Arabic numerals and Roman numerals are only used to count Superbowls so i wouldn’t say they contributed “nothing”

but i would agree that religion of Islam gets in the way of development … which is no different for Christianity … in fact Christians probably executed more scientists than Islam.

here is a quote from: https://www.quora.com/Which-scientists-and-philosophers-have-been-killed-by-the-church-and-religions

Some prominent examples are - Giordano Bruno, who was burned at the stake by the Catholic Church in 1600 for supporting the Copernican theory that the Earth revolves around the Sun. Galileo Galilei was put on trial and spent the last years of his life under house arrest by the Catholic Church for his astronomical findings.

In ancient Greece, the philosopher Socrates was condemned to death by drinking poison hemlock for allegedly corrupting the minds of youth and not believing in the state’s gods.

Michael Servetus, who made groundbreaking discoveries about the circulation of blood, was burned at the stake in 1553 by Protestant authorities for rejecting the doctrine of the Trinity.

Obviously a society that executes scientists for making scientific discoveries will fall behind. In Europe we called this the dark ages. The Muslims are currently in their dark ages with their throwing gays off rooftops etc.

It was NOT age of consent that brought Europe out of the dark ages, however.

It may very well be age of consent that EXTINCTS Europeans on the other hand.

and frankly the way we throw Men in prison for 20 years for having sex with pretty girls is more SIMILAR to Arabs throwing gays off rooftops than it is different.

it is pure barbarism.