Mercedes AMG P3 Layout explained by genius ( me )

P3 refers to location of electric motor in the chassis and drivetrain

there is no universally accepted terminology but the image above ( from ResearchGate ) is more or less what we’re talking about.

AMG P3 system actually has motors at both location P0 and P3 but because P0 is where Mild Hybrids have the electric motor and Mild Hybrids don’t even count as hybrids any more ( because they are so ubiquitous now as to virtually have replaced regular combustion cars at least for the likes of BMW ) it is the P3 that becomes the name of the system.

technically this is nothing new as my Volvo already has a motor in the back and another in the front just like AMG P3, and so does Toyota Prius AWD and Toyota RAV 4 Prime and so on …

but Volvo and Toyota are Front Wheel Drive ( FWD ) platforms that use a rear electric motor primarily to enable AWD functionality without using a propeller shaft …


by eliminating the drive shaft Volvo and RAV 4 can use the space to house the battery, whereas a Prius never offered a mechanical AWD to begin with. in other words yes both Volvo and Toyota have been using “P3” for a decade but not for the reasons AMG is using it …

AMG is a Rear Wheel Drive ( RWD ) platform that RETAINS the propeller shaft, and then adds the P3 motor on top of it … this is a very different proposition from Volvo and Toyota.

with Volvo and Toyota the ICE drives the front wheels only and the rear electric motor drives the rear wheels only

but with P3 ( just like with P2 ) both the engine and the motor drive all 4 wheels, because of the mechanical propeller shaft link between the front and rear axles.

thus Volvo and Toyota systems are efficiency minded - focused on saving weight and driveline losses - whereas AMG system is performance minded - no surprise really.

so let’s be real here - AMG P3 doesn’t compete with Toyota or Volvo - it competes with Porsche and BMW, both of whom use a P2 hybrid system.

for example here is Porsche Panamera hybrid system

electric components are in red ( and power cables in orange ).

you can see the motor is in P2 between engine and transmission. there is NO electric motor in P3 ( in the rear ).

BMW uses the same P2 approach, with some differences beyond the scope of this discussion.

our focus here is to discuss P3 vs P2 but it is not as simple as AMG vs Porsche and BMW because actually Mercedes and AMG also have P2 hybrids …

all older, Non-AMG Mercedes hybrids are P2 while all new E-Performance AMG models are P3

and yet it gets more complicated than that !

the new E-Class will have two AMG Hybrid models - the E53 Hybrid and E63 E-Performance

did you see what they did there ? the E53 is NOT getting the E-Performance badge ! it only gets a “hybrid” badge.

this is the actual badge on E53 which has already been revealed ( E63 not revealed yet, but we have insider information about it ).

compare this to the C63 E-Performance badge

one is called “Hybrid” while the other is called “E-Performance” … is that just because one is “53” and another “63” ?

NO !

E53 uses P2 hybrid system while E63 uses P3

that is of course not the only reason or even the main reason for the different badging. the main reason is they use different battery types.

the “hybrid” uses “energy” cells, optimized for range. the “e-performance” uses “power” cells optimized for, well, power.

but it just so happens that every P2 hybrid in Mercedes line up uses “energy” cells and is called “hybrid” and every P3 hybrid uses “power” cells and is called “e-performance”

why is this ?

because P3 is a higher-end system than P2. it costs more to make and is faster.

S Class is also offered with both P2 and P3 systems like the E-Class, with only the top dog S63 E-Performance getting the P3.

technically there is no reason why P3 couldn’t be used in efficiency-focused cars but because of the cost it is currently limited to the most expensive ( and thus fastest ) variants, namely the ones with “63” in the name.

“63” has become the AMG equivalent of what “Turbo” means to Porsche. yes of course AMG no longer makes 6.2 liter engines, but neither does Taycan Turbo have any turbos …

ok so Mercedes makes both P3 and P2 but P3 is the high-end option while P2 is the mid-range option ( and mild hybrid is the entry level )

so what makes P3 better than P2 ?

a few things:

1 - higher power and torque

2 - more seamless shifting

3 - better weight distribution

4 - better efficiency

let’s take these one by one …

1 - higher power and torque.

when the torque of engine and motor combine in a P2 system there is a range from about 2,000 rpm to 4,000 rpm or so where they combined torque is too much for transmission and is electronically limited.

you can see this in Panamera E-Hybrid launch videos.

the green lights on the bottom show “E-Power” and you can see it is far from constant … in fact it turns off completely at certain RPMs … this is because in P2 hybrids electric power is used for TORQUE FILL. it is used to supplement Internal Combustion Engine ( ICE ) where it is weak …

by contrast in P3 hybrid because the electric motor has its own transmission in the back it can never overload the front transmission and both ICE and Electric Motor can run at full blast simultaneously. if the Panamera was P3 those green lights would zoom to 100% and just stay there.

of course that would just overheat the battery, which is why for P3 E-Performance, AMG had to develop an IMMERSION COOLING SYSTEM where the battery cells are SUBMERGED into the cooling liquid ( which is non-conductive ). they then had to install a heat exchanger that transfers heat from the dielectric battery cooling liquid to the regular glycol based ( antifreeze ) cooling system.

needless to say when you have two motors, two transmissions and two cooling systems - that costs $$$ which is why only the “63” cars get this setup.

i say two motors because as mentioned before P3 systems also have an electric integrated starter generator on the front as well, but it is fairly small and mainly just used to start the engine - it doesn’t do much for performance, but it also doesn’t add much weight either.

2 - more seamless shifting

when i drove Audi P2 hybrid with a double clutch transmission the shifts were seamless enough, but double clutch transmissions have their issues with cost, reliability, torque limits and so on …

when i drove BMW P2 hybrid with ZF 8 speed automatic i was HORRIFIED by how bad the shifts were - there were HUGE gaps in power between gears because BMW uses pre-gearing stage for electric motor meaning it spins at high RPM and has huge inertia and without a torque converter ( which had to be removed to make room for the electric motor in transmission housing as all P2 hybrids do ) there is nothing to smooth out the shift when that electric motor has to drop from over 10,000 rpm so the only way BMW was able to make it work without breaking the transmission is by cutting power, which is why the new M5 hybrid is actually slower to 60 mph than old one that wasn’t hybrid …

yes the new M5 hybrid has more power but transmission can’t handle it, torque is limited electronically and shifts are slower … add to this 800 lbs of extra weight and you get a car that is slower than its predecessor … TOTAL FAIL FOR BMW.

M5 kept its V8, added an electric motor and got slower - all thanks to P2 layout.

by contrast AMG C63 cut V8 down to 4 cylinder and got FASTER, because of P3 layout ( and E-Turbo, and the fact the old one didn’t have AWD ).

basically without the burden of torque and inertia from electric motor integrated into transmission ( P2 ) the front transmission in P3 can shift as intended - quickly and without cutting power.

separately the transmission in the back is fully optimized for electric torque and inertia and shifts at different times form the one in the front. this means you are never completely without power as the two transmissions don’t shift at the same time so you’re never completely in between gears - you’re always in a gear either at the front or the back and because the propeller drive shaft connects the front and the back mechanically it means all 4 wheels get power at all times.

this is why EVs like Tesla are so quick to 60 mph - they don’t lose any time on gear shifts. P3 is basically a step closer to Tesla-like acceleration than P2 in BMW, although with a double clutch transmission Porsches also don’t really lose time on shifts. Panamera E-Hybrid is thus still competitive with AMG P3 because of the custom PDK transmission but BMW M5 is now basically dead because off the shelf ZF transmission can’t cope with combined torque and inertia from Twin Turbo V8 and Electric Motor with Pre-Gearing stage.

basically Porsche had a develop a new transmission for the Panamera E-Hybrid whereas Mercedes kept the old transmission in the front but added a new one in the back. Both systems work well.

BMW didn’t do anything to address the problem - they use the same system on the M5 as is used in entry level cars like 330e - just with more cylinders - the result is a car slower than the predecessor.

somehow both Porsche and AMG understood you can’t just take a hybrid system from an entry level car, put a twin turbo V8 on it and call it a day. but BMW did just that. this is almost like those idiots who buy a Miata and swap a corvette V8 in it.

even though Porsche is part of VW group the 8 speed PDK in the Panamera isn’t used in any lower level cars like Audi. developing an entire new transmission for just low volume cars like Porsche is a very expensive proposition but without this you get the M5 clusterfuck scenario.

Mercedes used the smartest approach - instead of developing an entire new multi-gear transmission they bought a 2-speed rear transmission from a supplier and installed it in the rear in addition to the main transmission in the front. this lowers development costs allowing cars like C63 E-Performance to come in with a starting price under 6 figures.

3 - better weight distribution

to some extent self explanatory.

motor has weight, so does the engine. when both are on the same axle you have unbalanced weight distribution. when motor is on one axle and engine on the other weight distribution is improved.

what you may not realize though is that when we’re talking power levels in the hundreds of kilowatts the CABLES used to supply the power are going to be pretty thick, and Copper used to make the cables is a semi precious metal. That means that manufacturers will want to keep the cables short and thus locate the battery and motor closer together.

thus in AMG P3 E-Performance the battery sits directly on top of the motor, which means both battery and motor are on rear axle while the engine is on the front. this results in essentially perfect 50/50 weight distribution.

4 - better efficiency

this one is not obvious at all, especially considering the cars with P3 can’t even get 20 mpg but that’s because of the 700 horsepower thing, and not P3 layout.

there are basically 3 reasons why P3 is more efficient.

A - simpler transmission design ( 2 speeds instead of 9 ) can have lower friction losses

B - separate transmission doesn’t tie motor RPM to engine RPM

C - different motor type is used

taking one by one …

A - simpler transmission design ( 2 speeds instead of 9 ) can have lower friction losses

modern transmissions are exceedingly complex mechanically. here are some images of the Ford / GM 10 sped transmission

power in such transmissions doesn’t flow directly put combines various planetary sets in different combinations to produce all the gear ratios.

by contrast Electric Motors due to their wide powerband with maximum torque at 0 rpm and peak RPM of about 15,000 barely need any gears at all. in case of Porsche Taycan and AMG P3 there is a 2-gear transmission - in such a transmission power flows directly reducing friction losses.

in fact the 2-speed transmission is so simple that AMG P3 integrates the motor, transmission and limited slip differential all into the same housing - which is purchased as a single unit from a supplier.

B - separate transmission doesn’t tie motor RPM to engine RPM

Combustion Engine is most efficient at the lowest RPM at which it can meet the load demands. Electric Motor is most efficient closer to its medium speed. So the optimum RPM for motor is much higher than optimum RPM for engine - and yet in P2 hybrids whenever the ICE runs the electric motor can only run at the same exact RPM as the ICE, whether that RPM is optimal for the motor or not.

with P3 the motor has its own 2-speed gearbox so RPM for motor and engine can run at different RPMs - each one at RPM that is optimal to it.

C - different motor type is used

motor type used in P3 configuration is the same as what is used in my Volvo or in full EVs, namely the rotor looks like this:

it’s basically a solid chunk of iron with some magnets in it. and then it goes into a stator that looks like this:

this is how you want your electric motor to look but such a motor would not work in P2 configuration for a number of reasons.

1 - it is too long.

2 - it has too much inertia.

3 - it spins too fast.

thus P2 hybrids use motors that look like this:

this motor is basically hollow on the inside. they used to be called “pancake” motors but as power demands grew they got thicker and no longer look like a pancake.

here is a lower power pancake Integrated Starter Generator used in P2 position

such motors are designed to have low profile, low rotational mass and high torque, which are rather mutually exclusive … such a motor is a one trick pony - it is good for torque fill, but not much else.

this motor is basically crippled by the need to be flat and hollow. it needs to be flat to fit in transmission and hollow because if it had a solid iron core the rotational inertia would break the transmission.

yet that solid iron core is what conducts the magnetic field - it isn’t just there for fun.

P3 allows the use of a full-fat EV motor instead of pancake motor because there is both the space for it and the custom transmission can handle the inertia of a solid chunk of iron spinning at 15,000 rpm. it can handle that because it is relatively much more simple than a 8, 9 or 10 speed transmission and also it ONLY needs to handle the motor, not the combination of Engine and Motor.

so there you have it - P3 is legit, and it makes AMG the current technology leader when it comes to drivetrains.

Porsche is in 2nd place with 8 speed PDK and electric turbo on the 911 GTS.

but Porsche to their credit is currently winning the suspension race with their Active Ride system.

as for BMW they still have Valvetronic - which is a tech that allows larger engines to have fuel economy of smaller engines.

Valvetronic always worked well when it works - the problem is that it would also often fail. BMW keeps redesigning the system so hopefully it is getting more reliable.

ideally i would like to see all technologies in one car: Active Ride, PDK, P3 Hybrid, Immersion Battery Cooling, E-Turbo and Valvetronic …

but you can only get some of them in any given car and if you also want to keep it under 6 figures your options dwindle further …

still, i like to know what tech is out there so i can make informed decisions …