How and why feminism happened
Feminism happened because we keep alive too many weakling idiotic males in childhood.
Wolves see the steppe a certain way as a natural side effect of their bio chemistries (eyesight for example). If chihuahua variants (different bio chemical combinations) start thriving from the litter, the steppe would be seen differently as a side effect of those new chemistries thriving.
Now, understand that white humans who use to die all the time throughout white history now live and thrive. These new strains are the liberals. They see the world differently as a fundamental side effect of their bio chemistries. They hate men like Chihuahua’s yelp and growl at German Shepherds.
Everything else happening is unwitting exploitation of human instincts for: female sexual value, conformity or tribe protection/rallying (eg male ‘honor’ impulse), brain modules for wishful thinking(‘religion’), gullibility.
Female mammals\most reptiles are dualistically submissive --they hate you for the very display in you that they desire; ie they hate you for it ‘after wards’.
The more infantile males act, the more females will be triggered into not liking them and trying to dominate --grabbing for their own masculinity (“filling the vacuum” thus exposing ‘equality’ gibberish for the ill thought through unachievable absurdity that it is).
The more dominant the males act/display, the more females will instinctually submit (with their highknees in the air --fact).
!Problem is… that in a group based species like ours, the males cap each others’ sexual displays, [alpha beta gamma, coup d eta stuff] making most males Non-dominant in their displays (even or especially the ‘winners’ given our foppish abstract/money status system which we males unwittingly snowballed into as a direct side effect of the endless and ancient struggle to cap each others’ displays/ status-/sex- bids.). This then triggers females autonomically/ deterministically into their own dominance attempt /display.
Think dog packs…
Once the runt males took over the dog pack [symptom of the males pulling each other down and parameterizing each others’ paths to ascendancy, where runt is the only type ironically non-vulnerable enough to get to the top], the adult females of the pack --the “bitches” (heh heh)-- were the only pack members left that still had adult-like fangs.
All the “politics” and “philosophies” of the last few centuries are just the growling noises at “the kill” as the bitches (the only real adults left in the pack) nip and bite the runt males (the only type of male left at the top of the white human dog-pack) into compliance.
Then that unravels the “family” (given that the male coyote is run off the territory by the female after knotting/breeding --since she’s tougher than him now or than he’s allowed to be) causing the next generation to be unbreedable with (in our human ‘acultured’/learned system).
…Now we all --the John Galt-ocracy-- wait for the worms to rot the structure.
It’s the way Rome fell…
Males cap each others’ masculine displays;
females become instinctively emboldened: triggered to apathy towards and dominance over males;
next generation (of social incompetoids and un en statused ex-conformists) shrugs to make it [the ‘corruption’] all go away.
he seems to understand the dynamics male-female relationships but he is clearly clueless about how everything is planned from the top down
he is trying to explain feminism as a natural phenomenon driven by low quality of males
reality is that feminism is at least a century old and precedes the modern male
modern male is a product of feminism not the other way around
Wouldn’t feminism have arisen anyway? There seems a natural rise and fall of peoples. Glubb talked about the Cycle of History:
As numerous points of interest have arisen
in the course of this essay, I close with a brief
summary, to refresh the reader’s mind.
(a) We do not learn from history because
our studies are brief and prejudiced.
(b) In a surprising manner, 250 years
emerges as the average length of national
(c) This average has not varied for 3,000
years. Does it represent ten generations?
(d) The stages of the rise and fall of great
nations seem to be:
The Age of Pioneers (outburst)
The Age of Conquests
The Age of Commerce
The Age of Affluence
The Age of Intellect
The Age of Decadence.
(e) Decadence is marked by:
An influx of foreigners
The Welfare State
A weakening of religion.
(f) Decadence is due to:
Too long a period of wealth and power
Love of money
The loss of a sense of duty.
(g) The life histories of great states are
amazingly similar, and are due to internal
(h) Their falls are diverse, because they are
largely the result of external causes.
(i) History should be taught as the history
of the human race, though of course with
emphasis on the history of the student’s own
It seems the cycle is inherent to how us humans do things.
Do the elites simply ride the tiger and prosper regardless?
Or do they direct the flow and relocate?
the way i see it whenever some civilization strikes gold so to speak Jews move in and ruin it.
in that sense it follows cycles and the “roaring 20s” followed by winning WW2 is what sealed our doom.
so i suppose yes it would have happened regardless but the mechanism by which it happens isn’t necessarily that men magically become faggots ( though it is possible that such a mechanism exists as well, i mean the mice in the experiment go extinct without any help from the Jews ) …
the mechanism by which it happens isn’t necessarily that men magically become faggots but that when Jews smell shekels in the air they move in and Jew everything up …
why do you think Africa is relatively unscathed - no communism, no faggotry, no vaccines - ?
because it’s a shithole and Jews don’t want to go there.
Jews fucked Germany because Germany was the pinnacle of western civilization until Jews destroyed it and moved to USA and now destroyed the USA too …
Jews aren’t dumb they go where the money is.
so yeah i guess both explanations are plausible. it could be an epigenetic mechanism killing off nations in 250 years similar to what kills off those mice in 600 days.
or it could be the Jews.
it’s dark and nobody is awake except me. time to watch some porn and then a movie.
I should say I believe just as trees don’t grow to the sky, civ. doesn’t get grander and grander like some Star Trek fever dream.
Something stops it.
If not Jews then our hubris, or some other internal failings.
(I have another Philosophy post from Sean McCloud where he posits some means of stabilizing the situation).
Newton’s 3rd law - there rises some opposing force to our “progress” and it stops or reverses.
Question: How do you see the chinese handling the civ decline problem? They are on the rise now…what do you see from them?
to be honest i have no idea what the role of China and Russia is in all of this.
my theories would look much better if China and Russia didn’t exist.
recently there was a story on GAB about how Israel formally accused China of Antisemitism when Chinese state TV showed them bombing Palestinian schools and added that Americans never see this because Jews control US media … i haven’t checked if this is a true story but if it is that is interesting …
Putin seems fairly pro-Jew and yet in the middle east he opposes US and Israel …
i don’t know what game is being played here …
Maybe they don’t. It could be just a game of “good cop, bad cop”.
They say up with Israel in the West, and criticise Israel in the East.
They all played the Covid game so they are all on the same team.
they also all went along with 911 story.
we’re giving Ukraine $40B in aid but we also “forgot” $40B in weapons in Afghanistan.
probably same kind of fake BS.
anyway i’m out to watch a movie.
In fairness, they may not have the influence now that they had on Mao.
But China is on the NWO agenda, with its part to play.
The nations are simply fighting about who has the best seats.