Bad News about my Array Design

when i started thinking about this system i thought i knew how arrays worked but i had no idea

i had to read and think quite a bit but eventually it all made sense

then i started adapting array tech from the typical music festival use to home use

during that course of time it became clear that idiots on DIY Audio have no idea what they’re doing when it comes to arrays and i got banned for realizing this and trying to teach them ( hurting their feelings in the process )

then i started to see opportunities to solve some of the problems associated with array use ( mainly the high cost ) and started posting updates on my design here:

( since i was banned from every other forum )

the system was now at a point where it was scientifically sound and almost worth building as a practical joke that people could read about and go “damn that guy is crazy”

until one day i came up with an idea that pretty much made this array system the obvious choice in much the same way as arrays are the obvious choice in prosound for music festivals like coachella …

the magic ingredient that makes arrays work in prosound is the software that allows precise pattern control and coverage of the crowd …

the magic ingredient that makes my array system work … is a secret.

and that’s the bad news. i will not be posting the design because it’s a secret.

it was not my goal to “fix” arrays - i just wanted to design a nice one and post that design. but i inadvertently ended up solving the root cause of the problem of why they aren’t used in home settings in the first place … and i am not going to tell anybody what that solution is.

if it is ever built you will find out what the solution was. if it is not built you won’t find out until somebody else figures it out.

i actually came up with several solutions that all accomplish the same thing, but they all have something in common and i won’t reveal what.

but it’s objectively innovative whereas what i wanted to post was merely a subjectively great design. not going to reveal the innovation.

so the horn system is now basically obsolete, because the Array wipes the floor with it - but i can’t reveal the array.

a week ago i was ready to delete the horn system design because it was clear the Array made it irrelevant but after deciding not to reveal the final form of the array the horn design will be staying up indefinitely as the best design that isn’t classified.

Maybe patent it, or do a deal with the company that provides speakers for Coachella and other festivals etc? They pay you X and hire you as a consultant for Y amount of USD if you are able to replicate what you are claiming.

Alex Hormozi has discussed various frameworks for making money in business, often emphasizing problem-solving and value creation. Based on available information, one of his notable frameworks for starting a business and generating revenue aligns with a post found on X, where he outlines three distinct approaches. These approaches are not explicitly labeled as “Do Different” or “Solve Something Hard” in the source, but they can be interpreted to fit the context of your question. Below are the three ways Hormozi describes for making money in business, with explanations that may correspond to the terms you mentioned:

  1. Solve a Problem Better Than Others (Execution Risk)

    • This approach involves taking an existing problem in the market and providing a superior solution through better execution, whether through efficiency, quality, or customer experience. Hormozi suggests this is the “surest money” because it leverages known demand but requires outperforming competitors. This could align with “Do Different,” as it emphasizes differentiating your solution in a crowded market by doing things better or uniquely.
  2. Solve a Problem No One Knew Existed (Product-Market Risk)

    • Here, the focus is on identifying and addressing latent needs—problems that customers may not even realize they have until a solution is presented. This involves higher risk due to uncertainty about market acceptance but offers significant rewards if successful, as it can create entirely new markets or niches. This might correspond to the “something else” you mentioned, as it’s about innovation and uncovering hidden opportunities.
  3. Solve a Problem Everyone Knows About but Is Hard to Solve (Technical Risk)

    • This involves tackling well-known, complex problems that are difficult to address due to technical, logistical, or resource challenges. Success in this area can yield substantial profits because of the high barriers to entry and the value of solving such problems. This directly aligns with “Solve Something Hard,” as it focuses on overcoming significant obstacles to deliver a solution.

These three strategies reflect Hormozi’s philosophy of aligning business opportunities with market needs and execution capabilities. The “surest money” lies in improving existing solutions, while the “biggest money” comes from pioneering new markets or solving tough problems. If you were referring to a different specific framework or video where Hormozi uses the exact phrases “Do Different” or “Solve Something Hard,” please provide more details (e.g., the source or context), and I can refine the answer further

Seems like you are good at 2 & 3 when it comes to sound and speakers. Get paid for it already simply because that will set you up to enjoy your freedom however you want.

i won’t make excuses i think i should do it.

rather i want to explain how it actually works, which is a bit more cynical than what Hormozi is saying.

the actual reality is the problem is trivially simple to solve but is presented as not solvable - this applies to many things, but most certainly to high-end audio

the example you may find easier to understand is car acceleration. it was presented as an unsolvable problem until Plaid came out now they can’t keep pretending that it was impossible anymore. reality is they always knew it was possible - but the money was in pretending that it wasn’t.

i remember when Taycan was first spotted testing they were benchmarking it against an older Model S even though a newer, faster Model S was already available. ( Porsche was testing prototype Taycan back to back versus an old Model S ) Nobody could understand why they wouldn’t benchmark it against the then current Model S.

but the answer was Porsche was still trying to pretend that they can’t make a sedan that is faster than a 911. it was only after sales of the Taycan started to tank after a few years on the market that they refreshed it and came out with the Taycan GT that was faster than the Plaid, because at that point they couldn’t keep pretending anymore.

high-end audio works the same way. there are people on Diy Audio that make amplifier mods for fun that increase performance by several orders of magnitude for basically no extra cost, because actually it was never hard in the first place - rather the industry’s revenue depends on the belief that it is hard.

Hypex makes cheap amplifier modules that weigh like 1 pound and outperform 100 pound amplifiers costing $10,000 and DIYers make their own amplifiers by simply putting those modules in a box. But if you go to Best Buy they still have giant McIntosh amps that weigh a ton and cost an arm and a leg and don’t come nowhere near the performance of Hypex modules but that’s what people keep buying …

why ? because people need to believe that for a system to sound good it has to be big, heavy and expensive. if you show them that something cheap and light works BETTER than their big, heavy and expensive amp - they will simply refuse to talk to you.

imagine coming up to a guy with a $30,000 watch and telling him that your $10 Casio watch keeps better time. he won’t talk to you. it’s the same with everything else - whether high end audio or cars or whatever.

what’s actually great about my speaker design is that it would be heavy and expensive LOL, which means it would actually have a chance !

the fact that performance would be an order of magnitude above anything that has ever existed would be a rather irrelevant side note. the selling point would be extreme size, weight, cost and the fact that it would look like nothing else.

nobody buys a Lambo because it is fast. people buy a Lambo because it looks cool and everybody knows that it is expensive. but my speaker would also look cool and more importantly look obviously expensive.

i designed it for myself, which means the performance would be beyond state of the art, like a car that does 0-60 in 0.1 seconds killing anybody who presses the gas too hard by producing acceleration forces equal to being stomped by an elephant. that is for my own amusement - it isn’t why anybody would buy it.

people would instead buy it because it literally would look like this :

it would literally consist of multiple giant arcs moved by motors to focus sound energy on the listener.

that is people would buy it for the novelty and wow factor, then never listen to it.

nobody ever listens to their high end speakers.

i should build one for myself, then assess the feasibility of mass producing it.

by “mass” i mean a couple of them. because it would cost in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.

i mean i would be able to make my own for like $50,000 but that’s by going with used amplifiers from e-Bay and making everything myself by hand and not having any kind of pretty finish and moving the parts manually ( not by motors ) and not spending on shipping or warranty / returns / marketing etc.

to sell such a product and actually make a profit it would have to cost perhaps $250,000.

still, i actually think it might be worth it. but there is no reason to talk about it until i have built a version for myself.

from discussing earlier versions of this design people want to see me build it. they are sick and tired of me talking about it. you can’t explain something like this to anybody. you have to build it.

and of course it’s the same with any other business. investors won’t be taken by your descriptions of what you say you can do. they want to see a working prototype.

in this case it’s quite doable. it would just require a lot of work, but as Robert Greene writes nothing lasting or worth having comes without hard work.

and in this case i would at least enjoy the work and if nobody thinks it can be commercialized it would still be worth it just for my own private amusement.

but first order of business is moving to Orlando. i will worry about this speaker later.

because of stupid Real ID law coming into effect in 3 weeks i need to get a Passport just to be able to fly to Florida …

once i have the passport i will fly to Orlando and try to finally get a house there …

my last trip to Florida i drove but it was exhausting. flying is much better.

i like the resort vibe that Orlando has. and i like that from Orlando i can reach any part of Florida and also can get the fuck out of Florida using a choice of two interstates ( 95 or 75 ) in case of Hurricane. I actually drove to Orlando on the 95 and back on 75 just to see both.

You were right about redneck central driving from Orlando north on the 75 but for a hurricane evacuation route it will do.

Re cars analogy, I call it purposeful castration - they have to kneecap their offerings often because because they are clinging to old paradigms which will be their downfall. Re speakers, well you are absolutely right if you are able to build a working prototype, attracting investor money can be done as all you need to market these things is partner up with a few rappers (cringy maybe but thats how it works) and then every swinging dick will HAVE to have them as a sign of status … will be like high end watches or cars but for rich celebrities and people to flex in their mansions when they throw parties - money is definitely there for such a product. Thirdly I think all you need is to go to DMV for real ID and present them some paperwork but if you going to move might as well get a passport. Orlando move seems like a good choice, when are you looking to do it ?

i am supposed to get a passport this week, then i will look at tickets. i still want to repair some patches in the lawn which requires constant watering for like 2 weeks. they are supposed to turn on the sprinklers tomorrow ( they turn them off for winter here to avoid pipes freezing and bursting ).

after last trip when i drove and stopped in a few towns and it took 3 weeks in total i was exhausted and needed time to recover. but i have recovered and anxious to go back. but still need to finish some things up first.

the other issue is Lennar ( which has the best prices out of New Construction homes ) doesn’t pay Real Estate Agents in that market and i don’t want to pay them myself so i need to figure out how to either do it without an agent or get an agent for some flat fee like $5,000 instead of 3% of home price.

technically since i wouldn’t be asking the agent to find a home for me, but instead only help with closing they should be willing to do it for less than their usual price. some people say you only need a lawyer and inspector and don’t need an agent but that sounds a bit scary.

so i have to figure this out as well before i go down there.

well actually they’re doing better than Tesla right now, because as the EV fad went from boom to bust they were able to fall back on older technology whereas Tesla had investors convinced that growth will be exponential but as demand for EVs cooled there isn’t anything Tesla can do.

also, unlike Tesla, legacy automakers had no vision but again, that is also their strength. because when reality and Tesla’s vision diverged Tesla’s strength became its weakness.

meanwhile Legacy just makes countless models of cars of all sorts and the market determines which ones make sense and which one do not. all this economy EV garbage like Nissan Leaf had completely flopped, but performance EVs from Legacy are doing as well as Tesla’s EVs. but Legacy also has ICE and Hybrids whereas Tesla only has EVs.

Cybertruck was a stroke of Genius as was Plaid, but the problem is there are only so many people looking for those kinds of vehicles. Tesla’s promise of exponential growth cannot be fulfilled using exotic vehicles like that.

With the novelty of EVs wearing off the average person ( who isn’t looking for a supercar or a supertruck ) has no reason too choose something like Model X/Y over a regular car / crossover.

sure some people will NEVER get the message and will continue to believe that Tesla is cool just like Boomers probably think that Elvis Presley is cool but to me Tesla is cringe.

i don’t have the data on how many people think Tesla is cringe vs cool though and i usually over-estimate people’s intelligence.

and Legacy has also gotten more cringe lately with the flush door handles and capacitive buttons and other Tesla-esque bullshit.

honestly Auto industry disgusts me. Elon didn’t disrupt it - he killed it. Killed the whole industry including Tesla itself.

i see cars as garbage now. like women.

I take it you are buying? if so all you need is a lawyer / title agency and thats that. You can probably even catch a better deal in 2-3 months summer time as prices are now coming down for myriad of reasons.

https://wolfstreet.com/2025/04/22/in-15-bigger-cities-condo-prices-already-10-to-22-5-are-in-florida-with-accelerating-drops-absurdity-comes-unglued/